Protect Vaccine Choice in Indiana!

The Indiana legislature is considering a bill, SB 162, that would mandate certain vaccinations for healthcare workers.

This is a direct attack on a patient’s right to decide which treatments make sense for them. Some flu shots, for instance, still contain mercury, a known toxin with adverse health effects. Forcing individuals to expose themselves to these dangers is cruel and unethical.

Take action to preserve our health freedom! Contact your state legislators and tell them to vote NO on SB 162.

Please contact your state legislators TODAY.

Recipients

Your State Senator or Senators

Contact

*Required fields

* Title:

* First Name:

* Last Name:

* Your Email:

* Address 1:

Address 2:

* City:

* State / Province:

* ZIP / Postal Code:

* Phone Number:

Yes, I would like to receive periodic updates and communications from Alliance for Natural Health USA.

Remember me. What's this?

Message

Please vote NO on SB 162

Dear [Decision Maker],

* Personalize your message

I understand a bill has been introduced, SB 162, that would mandate vaccinations for healthcare workers.

This raises a number of concerns for parents, children, and patients in general.

Patients have a right to make their own decisions about their treatments based on informed consent. Limiting a patient's ability to make informed decisions about what gets put into their body violates medical ethics.

I know that the vaccination question is a hotly debated topic, even in the medical community. There is an abundance of evidence, for instance, that shows the dangers of exposure to even small amounts of mercury, which can still be found in flu vaccines. Studies have linked mercury to severe neurological effects and even autism. Despite the widely touted belief that the link between vaccines and autism has been "debunked", researchers found 83 cases of autism among those compensated by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for vaccine-induced brain damage.

And then there's aluminum, another common vaccine ingredient. A study published in Current Medical Chemistry in 2011 stated that the "continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines for children as well as the general public may be of significant concern" because "aluminum presented in this form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences."

You don't need to take my word for it. The pharmaceutical companies themselves have acknowledged the dangers of their products. One of the fathers of Merck's vaccine program warned the company that six month olds would suffer dangerous exposure to mercury after being vaccinated. Eli Lilly conducted studies which concluded that thimerosal, the vaccine preservative that contains mercury, was toxic in concentrations as low as one part per million, which is 100 times weaker than the concentration found in some flu vaccines.

To force individuals to expose themselves to such risks hardly seems ethical.

However, I think we all can agree that we need to keep information clear, unambiguous, and uncensored, and to allow people to make informed choices for themselves and their families--especially when so much information and evidence exists of the possible dangers posed by some vaccines.

Current law protects both my family's health and our right to make our own healthcare choices, and I call upon you to oppose any legislation that would mandate vaccines for healthcare workers.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]